McGivney, Kluger & Cook and its clients are always moving forward. This page features recent articles, news releases, and links to sites and blogs, as well as information about upcoming and recent events. Please check back often to see what we and our clients are doing
There are perhaps few legal principles as widely debated as the principle of duty. In order to establish negligence, the plaintiff must show that the defendant owed him a duty of care.
There are perhaps few legal principles as widely debated as the principle of duty. In order to establish negligence, the plaintiff must show that the defendant owed him a duty of care.
Introduction. On June 29, 2018, the New Jersey Appellate Division issued its unpublished decision in Rowe v. Bell & Gossett, Docket No. A-4530-14T2 (App. Div. 2018) where, in response to Plaintiffs’ appeal, it reversed the April 27, 2015 judgment of $304,152.70, plus interest, against the lone defendant at trial, Universal Supply. The Court remanded the […]
There are perhaps few legal principles as widely debated as the principle of duty. In order to establish negligence, the plaintiff must show that the defendant owed him a duty of care.
There are perhaps few legal principles as widely debated as the principle of duty. In order to establish negligence, the plaintiff must show that the defendant owed him a duty of care.
There are perhaps few legal principles as widely debated as the principle of duty. In order to establish negligence, the plaintiff must show that the defendant owed him a duty of care.
There are perhaps few legal principles as widely debated as the principle of duty. In order to establish negligence, the plaintiff must show that the defendant owed him a duty of care.
There are perhaps few legal principles as widely debated as the principle of duty. In order to establish negligence, the plaintiff must show that the defendant owed him a duty of care.
There are perhaps few legal principles as widely debated as the principle of duty. In order to establish negligence, the plaintiff must show that the defendant owed him a duty of care.
There are perhaps few legal principles as widely debated as the principle of duty. In order to establish negligence, the plaintiff must show that the defendant owed him a duty of care.
Choice of Law Bars Malpractice Claim Against New Jersey Attorneys
The Proposed New Rule by the EPA: What Does it Mean and How Does it Affect Defendants?
Rowe v. Universal Supply: New Jersey Appellate Division Remands for New Trial as to Apportionment of Liability Only
Foreign Corporation and Personal Jurisdiction in Pennsylvania
Connecticut Appellate Court Refuses to Set Aside Verdict
Condon v. Pecora Corporation: New Jersey Appellate Division Holds that Pecora was Entitled to Summary Judgment as a Matter of Law and Vacates Judgment
Rhode Island Judge Denies Defendant’s Third Bite at the Summary Judgment Apple While Simultaneously Granting Asbestos Plaintiff’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal
Employers’ Duty of Care to Third Party Non-Employees in Rhode Island
An Opinion on “Take Home” Exposure Cases: Delaware Supreme Court Imposes New Duty to Warn on Manufacturers of Asbestos Products
New Case Law Indicates Schools Could Be Held Liable for Student Suicides in Massachusetts