Lawsuits alleging business websites and mobile applications have violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) are expected to rise sharply in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision to deny Domino’s Pizza’s (“Domino’s”) petition for a writ of certiorari.
Category Archives: News
Defense Verdict Awarded in First Bellwether Trial Regarding Chemotherapy Drug Taxotere
On September 26, 2019, a jury returned a verdict for the defense in the matter of Barbara Earnest v. Sanofi Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Service, Inc., in the Eastern District of Louisiana. The trial was presided over by Judge Jane TricheMilazzo, beginning on September 16, 2019.
New Jersey Modifies Additur and Remittitur To Require the Consent of All Parties, or New Damages Trials
Relying upon the common law, New Jersey courts have long utilized additur (adding to a jury’s excessively low damages award) and remittitur (reducing a jury’s excessively high damages award) when the trial judge concluded that there had been a miscarriage of justice, and that the verdict’s award amount could not reasonably be sustained by the evidence.
New Jersey Hospitals Are Not Shielded From Obligation to Identify “Adverse Events” in Treatment Records by Privilege for Self-Critical Analysis
New Jersey hospitals are required by the Patient Safety Act (“PSA”) to establish multidisciplinary patient safety committees, to help evaluate the facilities’ patient care and safety practices. Among these committees’ obligations are to perform self-critical analyses, called a “Root Cause Analysis,” when there is a “serious preventable adverse event.”
Expert’s Prior Workers’ Compensation Disability Determination Is Proper Topic on Cross-Examination, New Jersey Court Rules
In an unpublished decision the New Jersey Appellate Division held in Mark Ragnacci v. Medhat Ghaba, a verbal threshold motor vehicle accident case, that the defense was permitted to cross-examine Plaintiff’s medical expert regarding a report he authored in Plaintiff’s prior workers’ compensation action.
California Places Time Limits on Depositions in Mesothelioma and Silicosis Cases
In the recent case of Salas v. Adirondack Tr. Lines, Inc. (172 A.D.3d 775 [2d Dept. May 1, 2019]) the Appellate Division, Second Department ruled that a bus operator was not required to provide assistance to a disembarking passenger who neither requested assistance, nor was she visibly disabled.
To Help Or Not To Help? New York Court Declines to Impose Duty to Assist Disembarking Patrons on Common Carriers
In the recent case of Salas v. Adirondack Tr. Lines, Inc. (172 A.D.3d 775 [2d Dept. May 1, 2019]) the Appellate Division, Second Department ruled that a bus operator was not required to provide assistance to a disembarking passenger who neither requested assistance, nor was she visibly disabled.
New Jersey’s Governor Signs Bills Permitting Recovery of Uncompensated Medical Expenses in Automobile Accidents
The Supreme Court case of Haines v. Taft, 237 N.J. 271 (2019) held that uncompensated medical expenses incurred as a result of an automobile accident, that exceeded the plaintiffs’ $15,000 PIP (Personal Injury Protection) coverage limits, were inadmissible and therefore not recoverable in motor vehicle negligence actions.
Significant Physical Injuries and Depression Do Not Justify Late Filing of Notice of Claim, New Jersey Court Holds
New Jersey’s Appellate Division issued an unpublished decision in Antoinette Marra v. Hopatcong Senior Center, et al., holding that Plaintiff, Antoinette Marra’s significant physical injuries and resulting depression did not constitute extraordinary circumstances excusing the filing of a late notice of claim under the Tort Claims Act.
New Jersey Home Inspectors Subject to Consumer Fraud Liability, Court Rules
In an August 15, 2019 published decision, captioned Jodi Shaw, et al. v. Brian Shand, et al., A-5686-17T1, the New Jersey Appellate Division reversed a trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment to a licensed home inspector, finding that home inspectors could be liable under New Jersey’s Consumer Fraud Act (“CFA”), N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -210.