News

McGivney, Kluger, Clark & Intoccia and its clients are always moving forward. This page features recent articles, news releases, and links to sites and blogs, as well as information about upcoming and recent events.

New Jersey Modifies Additur and Remittitur To Require the Consent of All Parties, or New Damages Trials

New Jersey Modifies Additur and Remittitur To Require the Consent of All Parties, or New Damages Trials

October 15, 2019 Relying upon the common law, New Jersey courts have long utilized additur (adding to a jury’s excessively low damages award) and remittitur (reducing a jury’s excessively high damages award) when the trial judge concluded that there had been a miscarriage of justice, and that the verdict’s award […]

Read Article

New Jersey Modifies Additur and Remittitur To Require the Consent of All Parties, or New Damages Trials

New Jersey Hospitals Are Not Shielded From Obligation to Identify “Adverse Events” in Treatment Records by Privilege for Self-Critical Analysis

New Jersey Hospitals Are Not Shielded From Obligation to Identify “Adverse Events” in Treatment Records by Privilege for Self-Critical Analysis

October 11, 2019 New Jersey hospitals are required by the Patient Safety Act (“PSA”) to establish multidisciplinary patient safety committees, to help evaluate the facilities’ patient care and safety practices. Among these committees’ obligations are to perform self-critical analyses, called a “Root Cause Analysis,” when there is a “serious preventable […]

Read Article

New Jersey Hospitals Are Not Shielded From Obligation to Identify “Adverse Events” in Treatment Records by Privilege for Self-Critical Analysis

Expert’s Prior Workers’ Compensation Disability Determination Is Proper Topic on Cross-Examination, New Jersey Court Rules

Expert’s Prior Workers’ Compensation Disability Determination Is Proper Topic on Cross-Examination, New Jersey Court Rules

October 4, 2019 In an unpublished decision the New Jersey Appellate Division held in Mark Ragnacci v. Medhat Ghaba, a verbal threshold motor vehicle accident case, that the defense was permitted to cross-examine Plaintiff’s medical expert regarding a report he authored in Plaintiff’s prior workers’ compensation action. More specifically, the […]

Read Article

Expert’s Prior Workers’ Compensation Disability Determination Is Proper Topic on Cross-Examination, New Jersey Court Rules

California Places Time Limits on Depositions in Mesothelioma and Silicosis Cases

California Places Time Limits on Depositions in Mesothelioma and Silicosis Cases

October 1, 2019 Senate Bill 645 (“SB 645”) was introduced by California’s Senator Monning (D) on February 22, 2019 and was signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom on August 30, 2019. SB 645 adds a new section to the California Code of Civil Procedure relating to the timing of […]

Read Article

California Places Time Limits on Depositions in Mesothelioma and Silicosis Cases

To Help Or Not To Help? New York Court Declines to Impose Duty to Assist Disembarking Patrons on Common Carriers

To Help Or Not To Help? New York Court Declines to Impose Duty to Assist Disembarking Patrons on Common Carriers

September 26, 2019 In the recent case of Salas v. Adirondack Tr. Lines, Inc. (172 A.D.3d 775 [2d Dept. May 1, 2019]) the Appellate Division, Second Department ruled that a bus operator was not required to provide assistance to a disembarking passenger who neither requested assistance, nor was she visibly […]

Read Article

To Help Or Not To Help? New York Court Declines to Impose Duty to Assist Disembarking Patrons on Common Carriers

New Jersey’s Governor Signs Bills Permitting Recovery of Uncompensated Medical Expenses in Automobile Accidents

New Jersey’s Governor Signs Bills Permitting Recovery of Uncompensated Medical Expenses in Automobile Accidents

September 24, 2019 The Supreme Court case of Haines v. Taft , 237 N.J. 271 (2019) held that uncompensated medical expenses incurred as a result of an automobile accident, that exceeded the plaintiffs’ $15,000 PIP (Personal Injury Protection) coverage limits, were inadmissible and therefore not recoverable in motor vehicle negligence […]

Read Article

New Jersey’s Governor Signs Bills Permitting Recovery of Uncompensated Medical Expenses in Automobile Accidents

Significant Physical Injuries and Depression Do Not Justify Late Filing of Notice of Claim, New Jersey Court Holds

Significant Physical Injuries and Depression Do Not Justify Late Filing of Notice of Claim, New Jersey Court Holds

September 23, 2019 New Jersey’s Appellate Division issued an unpublished decision in Antoinette Marra v. Hopatcong Senior Center, et al., holding that Plaintiff, Antoinette Marra’s significant physical injuries and resulting depression did not constitute extraordinary circumstances excusing the filing of a late notice of claim under the Tort Claims Act. […]

Read Article

Significant Physical Injuries and Depression Do Not Justify Late Filing of Notice of Claim, New Jersey Court Holds

New Jersey Home Inspectors Subject to Consumer Fraud Liability, Court Rules

New Jersey Home Inspectors Subject to Consumer Fraud Liability, Court Rules

September 18, 2019 In an August 15, 2019 published decision, captioned Jodi Shaw, et al. v. Brian Shand, et al., A-5686-17T1, the New Jersey Appellate Division reversed a trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment to a licensed home inspector, finding that home inspectors could be liable under New Jersey’s […]

Read Article

New Jersey Home Inspectors Subject to Consumer Fraud Liability, Court Rules

New Jersey Supreme Court Unanimously Holds Settled Defendants’ Answers to Interrogatories and/or Corporate Representative Deposition Testimony Admissible for Proving Cross-Claims, Reversing the Appellate Division’s Prior Ruling in Rowe

New Jersey Supreme Court Unanimously Holds Settled Defendants’ Answers to Interrogatories and/or Corporate Representative Deposition Testimony Admissible for Proving Cross-Claims, Reversing the Appellate Division’s Prior Ruling in Rowe

September 16, 2019 This morning, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that in an asbestos personal injury action, a settled defendant’ s answers to interrogatories and/or corporate representative’ s deposition testimony, whether offered in the instant case or in another asbestos case in any jurisdiction, may be admissible as statements […]

Read Article

New Jersey Supreme Court Unanimously Holds Settled Defendants’ Answers to Interrogatories and/or Corporate Representative Deposition Testimony Admissible for Proving Cross-Claims, Reversing the Appellate Division’s Prior Ruling in Rowe

Pragmatic & Aggressive Management of Cases

We are committed to our clients and work closely with them to ensure their objectives are achieved. Our results-oriented, aggressive, cost-conscious, and customized approach to all cases has become the cornerstone of our firm, earning us a sterling reputation and solid client relationships.