News

McGivney, Kluger, Clark & Intoccia and its clients are always moving forward. This page features recent articles, news releases, and links to sites and blogs, as well as information about upcoming and recent events.

“Stearns v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.” Massachusetts’s Six-Year Statute of Repose and Asbestos Claims

“Stearns v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.” Massachusetts’s Six-Year Statute of Repose and Asbestos Claims

May 17, 2018 In Stearns v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., the Massachusetts District Court, Zobel, J., addressed whether the Massachusetts statute of repose for certain tort actions, codified as Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 260 § 2B (“Section 2B”), applies to asbestos claims. In Stearns, the plaintiffs brought a wrongful death […]

Read Article

“Stearns v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.” Massachusetts’s Six-Year Statute of Repose and Asbestos Claims

Does Connecticut Tort Law Permit Medical Monitoring Based on Asbestos Exposure in the Absence of a Present Injury?

Does Connecticut Tort Law Permit Medical Monitoring Based on Asbestos Exposure in the Absence of a Present Injury?

May 17, 2018 The court in Dougan v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. was faced with the issue of whether Connecticut tort law permits, or should permit, recovery based on asbestos exposure in the absence of any present clinical injury or physical symptoms of an asbestos-related illness or disease. 2017 Conn. Super. […]

Read Article

Does Connecticut Tort Law Permit Medical Monitoring Based on Asbestos Exposure in the Absence of a Present Injury?

“You’re on the Hook”: Rhode Island Superior Court finds Duty of Care Owed in “Secondary Exposure” Claim

“You’re on the Hook”: Rhode Island Superior Court finds Duty of Care Owed in “Secondary Exposure” Claim

May 8, 2018 There are perhaps few legal principles as widely debated as the principle of duty. In order to establish negligence, the plaintiff must show that the defendant owed him a duty of care. If there is no legal duty, then a case will usually meet its end through […]

Read Article

“You’re on the Hook”: Rhode Island Superior Court finds Duty of Care Owed in “Secondary Exposure” Claim

Rhode Island Judge Found Plaintiff’s Allegations of Asbestos Exposure Constituted Conjecture Inadequate

Rhode Island Judge Found Plaintiff’s Allegations of Asbestos Exposure Constituted Conjecture Inadequate

May 8, 2018 In a rare turn of events, on April 30 2018, Judge Alice B. Gibney vacated her prior judgment denying G.E.’s motion for summary judgment when presented with a Rule 60(b) Motion for Relief from Order filed by the defeated Defendant. Contrary to her earlier stance, Judge Gibney, […]

Read Article

Rhode Island Judge Found Plaintiff’s Allegations of Asbestos Exposure Constituted Conjecture Inadequate

Jurisdiction Matters: Personal Jurisidction Challenge in Connecticut Asbestos Case Prevails Under Judge Calmar in New London

Jurisdiction Matters: Personal Jurisidction Challenge in Connecticut Asbestos Case Prevails Under Judge Calmar in New London

May 3, 2018 On April 20, 2018, Judge Harry Calmar, who presides over the asbestos docket in New London Superior Court, granted Defendant, Pefection HY-Test Company’s (“ Perfection”), motion to dismiss all claims against it for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States, in […]

Read Article

Jurisdiction Matters: Personal Jurisidction Challenge in Connecticut Asbestos Case Prevails Under Judge Calmar in New London

Choice of Law Analysis as to Bare Metal Defense in Rhode Island Asbestos Case

Choice of Law Analysis as to Bare Metal Defense in Rhode Island Asbestos Case

May 3, 2018 Baumgartner v. Am. Std., Inc. is an interesting Rhode Island case which applied Ohio law, as the state of Ohio had the most significant relationship to the instant asbestos litigation. 2015 R.I. Super. LEXIS 91 (R.I. Super. Ct. 2015). The decision by Judge Gibney, the presiding asbestos […]

Read Article

Choice of Law Analysis as to Bare Metal Defense in Rhode Island Asbestos Case

“It’s all the Same”: The Connecticut Products Liability Act and Federal Maritime Law in Asbestos Litigation

“It’s all the Same”: The Connecticut Products Liability Act and Federal Maritime Law in Asbestos Litigation

May 1, 2018 In Connecticut, many products liability actions involving asbestos exposure have involved General Dynamics Electric Boat, a subsidiary of the General Dynamics Corporation, which has built submarines for the U.S. Navy for decades in the Town of Groton. As such, it is perhaps unsurprising that in Paquin v. […]

Read Article

“It’s all the Same”: The Connecticut Products Liability Act and Federal Maritime Law in Asbestos Litigation

No New Trial – Defense Verdict Stands

No New Trial – Defense Verdict Stands

April 30, 2018 The plaintiff, Marsha Lagerberg, individually and in her capacity as Executrix of the Estate of Erick Lagerberg, filed a petition for a new trial almost two years after the jury verdict in Lagerberg v. Rogers Corporation was reached in 2015. In that case, the plaintiff alleged that […]

Read Article

No New Trial – Defense Verdict Stands

“Sufficiently” Identifying an Asbestos-Containing Product without Specifically Identifying It

“Sufficiently” Identifying an Asbestos-Containing Product without Specifically Identifying It

April 10, 2018 It is an obvious tenet of an asbestos action that in order to establish asbestos exposure from a product, there must have been a product that contained asbestos. From the perspective of a defense attorney, the failure of a plaintiff to specifically identify an asbestos-containing product seems […]

Read Article

“Sufficiently” Identifying an Asbestos-Containing Product without Specifically Identifying It

Pragmatic & Aggressive Management of Cases

We are committed to our clients and work closely with them to ensure their objectives are achieved. Our results-oriented, aggressive, cost-conscious, and customized approach to all cases has become the cornerstone of our firm, earning us a sterling reputation and solid client relationships.