News

McGivney, Kluger, Clark & Intoccia and its clients are always moving forward. This page features recent articles, news releases, and links to sites and blogs, as well as information about upcoming and recent events.

Choice of Law Bars Malpractice Claim Against New Jersey Attorneys

Choice of Law Bars Malpractice Claim Against New Jersey Attorneys

July 18, 2018 In MTK Food Services, Inc. v. Sirius America Insurance Company, Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, Docket NoA-1309-17T2, Approved for Publication, June 29, 2018, the New Jersey Appellate Division considered whether the Pennsylvania’s two-year statute of limitation or whether New Jersey’s six-year statute of limitation applied […]

Read Article

Choice of Law Bars Malpractice Claim Against New Jersey Attorneys

The Proposed New Rule by the EPA: What Does it Mean and How Does it Affect Defendants?

The Proposed New Rule by the EPA: What Does it Mean and How Does it Affect Defendants?

July 18, 2018 New updates to the Toxic Substances Control Act prompted the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) to issue a proposed significant new use rule (“SNUR”) last month. In the first action of its kind related to asbestos, the SNUR will give the EPA power to investigate and prevent new […]

Read Article

The Proposed New Rule by the EPA: What Does it Mean and How Does it Affect Defendants?

Rowe v. Universal Supply: New Jersey Appellate Division Remands for New Trial as to Apportionment of Liability Only

Rowe v. Universal Supply: New Jersey Appellate Division Remands for New Trial as to Apportionment of Liability Only

Introduction. On June 29, 2018, the New Jersey Appellate Division issued its unpublished decision in Rowe v. Bell & Gossett, Docket No. A-4530-14T2 (App. Div. 2018) where, in response to Plaintiffs’ appeal, it reversed the April 27, 2015 judgment of $304,152.70, plus interest, against the lone defendant at trial, Universal […]

Read Article

Rowe v. Universal Supply: New Jersey Appellate Division Remands for New Trial as to Apportionment of Liability Only

Foreign Corporation and Personal Jurisdiction in Pennsylvania

Foreign Corporation and Personal Jurisdiction in Pennsylvania

July 10, 2018 On May 30, 2018, a Philadelphia, Pennsylvania trial court rejected a personal injury plaintiff’s argument that an out-of-state corporation consented to personal jurisdiction when it filed registration to conduct business in Pennsylvania. In an opinion written by the Honorable Arnold L. New, in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern […]

Read Article

Foreign Corporation and Personal Jurisdiction in Pennsylvania

Connecticut Appellate Court Refuses to Set Aside Verdict

Connecticut Appellate Court Refuses to Set Aside Verdict

July 10, 2018 Many times, a jury will award the plaintiff all of her economic damages but nothing in terms of noneconomic damages. In Micalizzi v. Stewart , 181 Conn.App. 671 (2018), the Connecticut Appellate Court addressed this situation yet again, but under circumstances that may make it even more […]

Read Article

Connecticut Appellate Court Refuses to Set Aside Verdict

Condon v. Pecora Corporation: New Jersey Appellate Division Holds that Pecora was Entitled to Summary Judgment as a Matter of Law and Vacates Judgment

Condon v. Pecora Corporation: New Jersey Appellate Division Holds that Pecora was Entitled to Summary Judgment as a Matter of Law and Vacates Judgment

July 10, 2018 On July 9, 2018, the New Jersey Appellate Division issued its unpublished decision in Condon v. Pecora Corporation, et al ., Docket No. A-3642-14T1 (App. Div. 2018), wherein it reversed the trial court’ s denial of Pecora’ s summary judgment motion and vacated Pecora’ s portion of […]

Read Article

Condon v. Pecora Corporation: New Jersey Appellate Division Holds that Pecora was Entitled to Summary Judgment as a Matter of Law and Vacates Judgment

Rhode Island Judge Denies Defendant’s Third Bite at the Summary Judgment Apple While Simultaneously Granting Asbestos Plaintiff’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal

Rhode Island Judge Denies Defendant’s Third Bite at the Summary Judgment Apple While Simultaneously Granting Asbestos Plaintiff’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal

July 10, 2018 The Honorable Gibney, P.J. in the Providence County Superior Court of Rhode Island on June 26, 2016 denied Defendant, Evenheat’s motion for leave to renew its motion for summary judgment in Loretta Belac v. 3M Company, Et. al . In a ruling that essentially prevented Evenheat from […]

Read Article

Rhode Island Judge Denies Defendant’s Third Bite at the Summary Judgment Apple While Simultaneously Granting Asbestos Plaintiff’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal

Employers’ Duty of Care to Third Party Non-Employees in Rhode Island

Employers’ Duty of Care to Third Party Non-Employees in Rhode Island

July 10, 2018 In a recent Rhode Island Superior Court decision, Nichols v. Allis Chalmers Prod. Liab. Trust, the Court (Taft-Carter, J.) denied the defendant employer’s motion for summary judgment, ruling that an employer had a duty to protect third party non-employees who came into contact with its employee’s asbestos-covered […]

Read Article

Employers’ Duty of Care to Third Party Non-Employees in Rhode Island

An Opinion on “Take Home” Exposure Cases: Delaware Supreme Court Imposes New Duty to Warn on Manufacturers of Asbestos Products

An Opinion on “Take Home” Exposure Cases: Delaware Supreme Court Imposes New Duty to Warn on Manufacturers of Asbestos Products

June 29, 2018 Since 2009, Delaware courts have adhered to the “take home” asbestos exposure principles set forth in the prior decisions of Riedel and Price. In those cases, the Courts held that an employer could not be held liable in tort to the employee’s spouse who laundered his asbestos-covered […]

Read Article

An Opinion on “Take Home” Exposure Cases: Delaware Supreme Court Imposes New Duty to Warn on Manufacturers of Asbestos Products

Pragmatic & Aggressive Management of Cases

We are committed to our clients and work closely with them to ensure their objectives are achieved. Our results-oriented, aggressive, cost-conscious, and customized approach to all cases has become the cornerstone of our firm, earning us a sterling reputation and solid client relationships.